Storm IQ Tour Nano Pearl Bowling Ball

Storm IQ Tour Nano Pearl Bowling Ball
Storm IQ Tour Nano Pearl Layout Bowling Ball
Haleys Pro Shop Logo
Visit Haley's Pro Shop Today!

Offset Impressions
Its an IQ Bout. Tin it exist bad?

Thanks to our new partner Haley'due south Pro Shop. A big thank yous to Jeff Miller and Ron Hoppe. Don't forget to cheque out Haley's Pro Shop for world form drilling and coaching!

Tamer Elbaga (Lefty)
Style: Tweener
RPM: 375 rpm
PAP: 5 & 3/8 upward
Boilerplate Speed: 18.v mph (at release)
Axis tilt: low
Axis rotation: medium/high
Test Equipment: xv Pounds
Layout: 45 10 4.75 x 45

Bryan Hoffman (Righty)
Fashion: Higher Tilt Stroker
RPM: 280 rpm
PAP: 4 i/4 & i/eight downward
Average Speed: 17.v mph (at release)
Axis tilt: loftier
Axis rotation: medium
Examination Equipment: 14 Pounds
Layout: 5 10 45

"Keep in mind that coverstock accounts for seventy% of ball reaction, but the core creates the dynamic shape of the reaction. Your driller volition change the shape to suit your game."

Blueprint
THS: 40 ft Med THS

Specs
The Storm IQ Tour Nano Pearl Bowling Ball uses the C3 Centripetal Core (symmetrical) within the NRG Pearl coverstock.

15 pound = RG of 2.49, unequal of .029
Coverstock finish: 3000 grit abralon

Category
I would consider this ball in the mid control category.

Overall
I must admit my first impression is a bit of a cop out. The world is nearly sure to love the IQ Tour Nano Pearl, at least anyone who's liked it before. The C3 Centripetal Core works for many people. Low unequal excellent control. I always idea that it would exist a great ball for me as a lefty but with the IQ Tour solid, information technology was more of a pocket control but mediocre carry. With the Nano Pearl, initially I saw a couple of apartment 7s and idea oh here we go. But and then some better execution and I saw stronger motion and practiced drive. The biggest issue I had was the cover in 3000 abralon seems simply too potent for this firm pattern which forces me in while at the aforementioned fourth dimension, this isn't a loop the lane blazon core. Yet it surprised me with more backend capabilities than I was expecting. This house shot is playing a flake reverse blocked and then if you go outside downlane, you have no chance to go back to the headpin but it hooks a ton from inside. Feed into the friction a touch and I mean a touch on too early and I'chiliad through the face. Effort to push it through and it doesn't brand the headpin.

Rather than focus on the pattern, I want to focus on the brawl itself. I do like the shape the Centripetal cadre creates on lane and always have. This is a case where I really want to have this surface upwards to make it work properly on this shot. My frustration was that I had to throw it too adept to get results on the house shot. So I had to make a 2d trip to see it once more on a sport shot.

The IQ Tour Nano Pearl is smooth withal has some boominess downlane. Information technology responds to friction smoothly but pretty strongly. I typically find balls with weaker cores and stiff covers not matching my game just this match upwardly didn't experience terrible for me as the core doesn't puke downlane.

For Bryan, he saw the same affair. Initially he was going through the face and if projecting right, it doesn't recover. Once he realized this brawl was reading fashion before than the Parallax and Trend nosotros tested, he paralleled everything in going about 14 to 11. The ball created a nice arcing shape which is what you wait from this ball. The "too much surface, too weak a core" syndrome is exacerbated with Bryan'south game. And then giving away the pocket was a no-no. He benefited a fleck from some shim in only out was a no-go, especially with this much surface out of box.

Sport Shot
For the Sport shot, I tested on the Kegel Arsenic blueprint, a 41ft a one.three:1 25.79ml pattern. I have to acknowledge this is i tricky pattern, kind of similar Red Foursquare in many regards. I started out with more defoliation than solutions. The pattern is not one conducive to direct play. It requires some bending but the breakpoint at the edge is extremely difficult to maintain. If you play information technology too close say you need 8 and hit 7.v, you are leaving a (iii-7-9) 2-8-ten. Miss to 10 and you're brooklyn. Then this is a pattern I feel fall back tin exist very constructive. You desire to take reward of the backend motion while moving abroad from the accented cliff. I thought I would struggle mightily after the beginning agglomeration of shots but once I started getting to the 4th arrow to 10, the shot was great. I could movement in three-2 every few assurance and even with my rev rate get a pretty skilful look. Non to forget that I can withal leave corners, the IQ Tour Nano Pearl reminded me with rap 7 and flat pocket 7-10. At the finish, you give up the more aggressive movement in favor of consistency and that is fundamental on tougher patterns many times.

Terminal Thoughts
Where are nosotros with the Tempest IQ Tour Nano Pearl? If y'all have loved this series and have been looking for the return of the IQ Bout Nano, this is darn nearly close plenty. The ball volition not surprise and it's certain to be successful. To those that loved this series, they will get all the benefits they've previously seen. Great control, polish but arcing movement. High rev bowlers and those bowling on sport shots demand a ball like this in their bag. If you were plagued by certain limitations from this series, yous are probable to nonetheless see some of that. So pocket command but some flat corners are still in that location, admitting a scrap less than what I've experienced with say the IQ Bout. For my game, I tend to lean towards bigger cores with weaker covers for control vs the opposite which is the example with the IQTNP. All the same, I ever wished I held onto the IQ Bout Nano every bit it was a bit different and this is my chance.